<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: MMS iPhone 3G/3GS date announced by AT&amp;T</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.quickpwn.com/2009/09/352-mms-iphone-at-t.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.quickpwn.com/2009/09/352-mms-iphone-at-t.html</link>
	<description>Technology news, iPhone news, and more!</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 03 Feb 2012 03:09:13 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Reaper0666</title>
		<link>http://www.quickpwn.com/2009/09/352-mms-iphone-at-t.html/comment-page-2#comment-19287</link>
		<dc:creator>Reaper0666</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Sep 2009 17:51:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.quickpwn.com/?p=1407#comment-19287</guid>
		<description>I have a 3g running 3.0.1. I have the tethering hack and use it daily. I want to be able to mms but teatherinh is more important. Any ideas?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have a 3g running 3.0.1. I have the tethering hack and use it daily. I want to be able to mms but teatherinh is more important. Any ideas?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Matt</title>
		<link>http://www.quickpwn.com/2009/09/352-mms-iphone-at-t.html/comment-page-2#comment-18697</link>
		<dc:creator>Matt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Sep 2009 02:17:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.quickpwn.com/?p=1407#comment-18697</guid>
		<description>Wow you need to represent better for an AT&amp;T Employee.  Your grammar and your message structure were atrocious.  Have some pride in your company.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wow you need to represent better for an AT&amp;T Employee.  Your grammar and your message structure were atrocious.  Have some pride in your company.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jim</title>
		<link>http://www.quickpwn.com/2009/09/352-mms-iphone-at-t.html/comment-page-2#comment-18313</link>
		<dc:creator>Jim</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 13 Sep 2009 11:59:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.quickpwn.com/?p=1407#comment-18313</guid>
		<description>Sure mmms was out in the 5.0 but by trying that little work-around with the sim card swapping and etc... it would disable vvm so at&amp;t needed to re-configure the carrier file correctly for the iphone b/c im sure we were using the carrier file for a non smartphone! stop complaining its only 10 days away! :D</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sure mmms was out in the 5.0 but by trying that little work-around with the sim card swapping and etc&#8230; it would disable vvm so at&amp;t needed to re-configure the carrier file correctly for the iphone b/c im sure we were using the carrier file for a non smartphone! stop complaining its only 10 days away! :D</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Hunter Boone</title>
		<link>http://www.quickpwn.com/2009/09/352-mms-iphone-at-t.html/comment-page-2#comment-18164</link>
		<dc:creator>Hunter Boone</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 Sep 2009 21:37:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.quickpwn.com/?p=1407#comment-18164</guid>
		<description>I don&#039;t really think it&#039;s an issue that MMS is being released the 25th.

My only guess is that AT&amp;T couldn&#039;t handle iPhone MMS with their infrastructure. Upgrades probably needed to be made to accommodate the iPhone and it&#039;s user&#039;s unlimited data-plan.

This is a great-step for AT&amp;T to be able to handle this.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t really think it&#8217;s an issue that MMS is being released the 25th.</p>
<p>My only guess is that AT&amp;T couldn&#8217;t handle iPhone MMS with their infrastructure. Upgrades probably needed to be made to accommodate the iPhone and it&#8217;s user&#8217;s unlimited data-plan.</p>
<p>This is a great-step for AT&amp;T to be able to handle this.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Reed</title>
		<link>http://www.quickpwn.com/2009/09/352-mms-iphone-at-t.html/comment-page-2#comment-18147</link>
		<dc:creator>Reed</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 Sep 2009 19:40:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.quickpwn.com/?p=1407#comment-18147</guid>
		<description>Mr AT&amp;T,

First off, let me remind you that jailbroken phones have been able to enjoy native MMS since about a week after the 3.0 launch. Therefore, there was and/or is a way to provision the phone for MMS. I personally don&#039;t appreciate your companys attitude of &quot;We will have it out this summer... Maybe... If we feel like it...&quot; Especially when there has been an almost perfect way of doing it for months. Having it up by the 25th isn&#039;t an accomplishment, its a disgrace to your paying customers. Maybe if you had it up by June 25th it would have been at least good business practice.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Mr AT&amp;T,</p>
<p>First off, let me remind you that jailbroken phones have been able to enjoy native MMS since about a week after the 3.0 launch. Therefore, there was and/or is a way to provision the phone for MMS. I personally don&#8217;t appreciate your companys attitude of &#8220;We will have it out this summer&#8230; Maybe&#8230; If we feel like it&#8230;&#8221; Especially when there has been an almost perfect way of doing it for months. Having it up by the 25th isn&#8217;t an accomplishment, its a disgrace to your paying customers. Maybe if you had it up by June 25th it would have been at least good business practice.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mr att</title>
		<link>http://www.quickpwn.com/2009/09/352-mms-iphone-at-t.html/comment-page-2#comment-17581</link>
		<dc:creator>Mr att</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Sep 2009 22:28:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.quickpwn.com/?p=1407#comment-17581</guid>
		<description>First off I work for Att secondly these posts show  Once again that people believe what they want to. Att did not provision mms because apple did not support it. Then they launch the 3gs and decide that it is time. World wide the only had to provision for the new product not the priors. Now with several million iPhone that did not support the feature it was never built in. So in order to provision correctly it takes time. We learned if the release when the rest if the world did and could not have 1/3 of our iPhone customers able to do something and not the others. So now that we finally have the feature provisioned and will allow all 3g and 3gs models up and running by the 25th is an accomplishment.  So quit crying and enjoy the cheap porn your buddy is gonna send you.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>First off I work for Att secondly these posts show  Once again that people believe what they want to. Att did not provision mms because apple did not support it. Then they launch the 3gs and decide that it is time. World wide the only had to provision for the new product not the priors. Now with several million iPhone that did not support the feature it was never built in. So in order to provision correctly it takes time. We learned if the release when the rest if the world did and could not have 1/3 of our iPhone customers able to do something and not the others. So now that we finally have the feature provisioned and will allow all 3g and 3gs models up and running by the 25th is an accomplishment.  So quit crying and enjoy the cheap porn your buddy is gonna send you.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jo</title>
		<link>http://www.quickpwn.com/2009/09/352-mms-iphone-at-t.html/comment-page-2#comment-17260</link>
		<dc:creator>Jo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 Sep 2009 22:28:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.quickpwn.com/?p=1407#comment-17260</guid>
		<description>really..?? sept 25?? its no longer summer at that point. ... they said end of summer, not after summer. I didnt think they&#039;d wait to the last effing minute. its no wonder apple and att keep getting sued. altho the mms thing probably isnt apples fault, but still. att knew this was coming they shoulda started working on it a LONG TIME AGO! im glad people are suing :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>really..?? sept 25?? its no longer summer at that point. &#8230; they said end of summer, not after summer. I didnt think they&#8217;d wait to the last effing minute. its no wonder apple and att keep getting sued. altho the mms thing probably isnt apples fault, but still. att knew this was coming they shoulda started working on it a LONG TIME AGO! im glad people are suing :)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Makiitnes</title>
		<link>http://www.quickpwn.com/2009/09/352-mms-iphone-at-t.html/comment-page-1#comment-17138</link>
		<dc:creator>Makiitnes</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 06 Sep 2009 02:38:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.quickpwn.com/?p=1407#comment-17138</guid>
		<description>It&#039;s about damn time, said the guy who&#039;s had every generation &amp; has been patiently wait&#039;n. Now will redsn0w work on the new 3.1.1 update?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s about damn time, said the guy who&#8217;s had every generation &amp; has been patiently wait&#8217;n. Now will redsn0w work on the new 3.1.1 update?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Hans</title>
		<link>http://www.quickpwn.com/2009/09/352-mms-iphone-at-t.html/comment-page-1#comment-17102</link>
		<dc:creator>Hans</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 05 Sep 2009 20:23:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.quickpwn.com/?p=1407#comment-17102</guid>
		<description>I thought Apple would be releasing a 3.1 update in September 9 along with the new iPod Touch, but I guess we&#039;ll just have to wait and see.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I thought Apple would be releasing a 3.1 update in September 9 along with the new iPod Touch, but I guess we&#8217;ll just have to wait and see.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Justin</title>
		<link>http://www.quickpwn.com/2009/09/352-mms-iphone-at-t.html/comment-page-1#comment-17099</link>
		<dc:creator>Justin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 05 Sep 2009 20:17:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.quickpwn.com/?p=1407#comment-17099</guid>
		<description>The good news is AT&amp;T is already turning it on, you just need 3.1 or the right carrier file hacked in.  So far it seems the southeast is good to go and can confirm it works for me in Miami.

Because it&#039;s already working now I think that 3.1 is going to come out on the 25th. Also, I don&#039;t think Apple would release 3.1 and then 2 weeks later have their customers have to download a carrier file update.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The good news is AT&amp;T is already turning it on, you just need 3.1 or the right carrier file hacked in.  So far it seems the southeast is good to go and can confirm it works for me in Miami.</p>
<p>Because it&#8217;s already working now I think that 3.1 is going to come out on the 25th. Also, I don&#8217;t think Apple would release 3.1 and then 2 weeks later have their customers have to download a carrier file update.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

